|

|
PubMed |
|
PubMed: Emergency Medicine
|
NCBI: db=PubMed; Term=Emergency Medicine
|
|
-
Differences between Emergency Patients and Their Doctors in the Perception of Physician Empathy : Implications for Medical Education.
Differences between Emergency Patients and Their Doctors in the Perception of Physician Empathy : Implications for Medical Education. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):144 Authors: Lin CS, Hsu MY, Chong CF CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: Conveying empathy is a multi-phase process involving an inner resonation phase, communication phase, and reception phase. Previous investigations on physician empathy have focused on a physician's inner resonation phase or communication phase and not on the patient's reception phase. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in the perception of physicians' empathy between emergency physicians (EPs) and their patients. The answer to this question will allow us to more fully understand all phases of empathy and will help guide the teaching of how to effectively communicate empathy in the clinical setting. METHODS: From 2004 to 2005, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 7 each of EPs, patients, patients' family members and nurses. A phenomenological approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the analysis: (1) When patients expressed their feelings, EPs usually did not resonate with their concerns; (2) Patients needed EPs to provide psychological comfort, but EPs focused only on patients' physical discomfort; (3) Patients needed appropriate feedback from EPs, but EPs did not reflect on whether their patients had received empathy from them; (4) EPs' ability to empathize was affected by environmental factors, which EPs found difficult to overcome. CONCLUSION: EPs and their patients perceive the physicians' empathy differently. These findings provide insights into patients' perceptions of their physicians' empathic expressions and provide a framework for teaching physicians how to convey empathy in the emergency department setting. PMID: 19039746 [PubMed - in process]
-
Management of syncope in the Emergency Department: a single hospital observational case series based on the application of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.
Management of syncope in the Emergency Department: a single hospital observational case series based on the application of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. Europace. 2008 Nov 27; Authors: McCarthy F, McMahon CG, Geary U, Plunkett PK, Kenny RA, Cunningham CJ Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing a European Society of Cardiology guideline-based Integrated Care Plan (ICP) for Syncope on hospital admissions and referral patterns to an outpatient Syncope Management Unit, of patients presenting to an Emergency Department (ED) with a syncopal episode and to determine the underlying causes of syncope. Methods and results This study is a single-centre observational case series of consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED over a 5-month period. Two hundred and fourteen of 18 898 patients (1.1%) had a syncopal episode, 110 (51.4%) of whom were admitted. Forty-six (41.8%) admissions were indicated by the ICP. All potential cardiac syncope cases were admitted. There was a 500% increase in the overall number of referrals to the Syncope Management Unit with a small increase in the number of unnecessary referrals. Conclusion The introduction of an ICP for syncope was not associated with any cases with potential adverse outcomes being lost to follow-up and resulted in increased referral rates to the syncope unit. However, hospitalization rates for syncope remain high, and a large number of patients requiring early outpatient assessment were not referred. There remains a need to develop further interventions to guide appropriate and safe syncope management in the ED. PMID: 19038976 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
-
Patterns and Predictors of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Derangements in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Patterns and Predictors of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Derangements in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2008 Nov 26; Authors: Bang OY, Saver JL, Alger JR, Shah SH, Buck BH, Starkman S, Ovbiagele B, Liebeskind DS, BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI permeability imaging is a promising approach to identify patients with acute ischemic stroke with an increased propensity for hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Permeability imaging provides direct visualization of blood-brain barrier derangements in ischemic fields. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and MRI data on patients with acute cerebral ischemia within the middle cerebral artery territory to identify the frequency, patterns, and predictors of permeability derangements and their association with HT types. RESULTS: A total of 179 permeability scans was obtained in 127 patients (59 men; mean age, 66.8 years). Among 179 image sets (82 pre-/no treatment and 97 posttreatment), permeability derangements were present in 29 images, frequently at the basal ganglia (n=23) and rarely at the juxta-cortical area (n=6). After adjusting for covariates, diastolic pressure (OR, 1.12, per 1-mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.22) and s-glucose (OR, 1.04, per 1-mg/dL increase; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.07) were independently associated with pretreatment permeability derangements, whereas low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 0.97, per 1-mg/dL increase; 95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99), malignant MRI profile (OR, 24.84; 95% CI, 1.50 to 412.93), and time from onset to recanalization therapy (OR, 1.47, per 1-hour increase; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.96) were independently associated with permeability derangements after recanalization therapy. Types of HT varied among the patients with permeability derangements (no HT, 4; hemorrhagic infarct type, 12; and parenchymal hematoma, 13) and transient derangements (without subsequent HT) and normalization of derangements (in the presence of HT) on permeability images was observed in several cases. CONCLUSIONS: Permeability derangements, a dynamic process associated with ischemic stroke pathophysiology and recanalization therapy, vary in pattern and evolution toward HT. Several prognostic and therapeutic predictors for HT are independently associated with pre- and posttreatment permeability derangements. PMID: 19038915 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
-
Glass foreign body in soft tissue: possibility of high morbidity due to delayed migration.
Glass foreign body in soft tissue: possibility of high morbidity due to delayed migration. J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov 25; Authors: Ozsarac M, Demircan A, Sener S Background: Soft tissue foreign bodies (FBs) are a common occurrence in emergency departments (EDs). Some FBs cause complications, whereas others are asymptomatic and remain undetected for months or years. Case Report: A 32-year-old man presented to the ED with complaints of back pain in the area of a subcutaneous lump that had migrated toward the midline, nearly 25 cm from its former location, over the previous 2 weeks. Twelve years previously, after falling onto a glass door that shattered, he had gone to a local ED and had his wound sutured, but no X-ray studies were taken. Within a few months, he noticed a lump near his scapula, but he did not relate it to the fall and it did not bother him much. Physical examination revealed a normal neurological examination and a palpable mass in the right paraspinal area at the level of the tenth thoracic vertebra. An X-ray study showed a 34-mm-long sharp density in the vicinity of the spinal canal near T10. Efforts lasting almost 2 h to identify and remove the foreign body were unsuccessful. The following day, a 4 x 6 x 34 mm sharp glass fragment was removed in the operating room under fluoroscopy. Conclusions: Retained soft-tissue foreign bodies may migrate very late and can cause high morbidity or mortality. It is important to be diligent in the search for foreign bodies, using ultrasound, computed tomography scan, or magnetic resonance imaging in cases in which initial plain radiographs are negative. PMID: 19038521 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
-
Ultrasound diagnosis of type a aortic dissection.
Ultrasound diagnosis of type a aortic dissection. J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov 25; Authors: Perkins AM, Liteplo A, Noble VE Background: An aortic dissection is a life-threatening process that must be diagnosed and treated expeditiously. Imaging modalities used for diagnosis in the emergency department include computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and trans-esophageal echocardiography. There are significant limitations to these studies, including patient contraindications (intravenous contrast dye allergies, renal insufficiency, metal-containing implants, hemodynamic instability) and the length of time required for study completion and interpretation by a radiologist or cardiologist. Objectives: A case is presented that demonstrates how emergency physicians can use trans-thoracic and abdominal bedside ultrasound to diagnose a type A aortic dissection. Case Report: A 72-year-old woman presented with chest pain radiating to her neck and back that was concerning for aortic dissection. This was subsequently confirmed and further classified as a type A dissection by bedside emergency physician-performed ultrasound. The images showed a clear intimal flap in the abdominal aorta, a dilatated aortic root, and extension of the intimal flap into the left common carotid artery. With prompt diagnosis, the patient was able to have emergent surgical consultation, confirmatory imaging, and intervention before further complication occurred. Conclusion: This case provides an example of how emergency trans-thoracic and abdominal ultrasound can be used to promptly diagnose a type A aortic dissection and expedite further consultation and prompt management. PMID: 19038520 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
|
|
Copyright (c) 2007 by New Medical Journals an associate of Amazon.com. All rights reserved. Amazon.com is a trademark of Amazon.com. Information about prices, products, services and merchants is provided by third parties and is for informational purposes only. NewMedicalJournals.com does not represent or warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information, and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
|